![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
Quantitative
assessment of locomotor and
upper-extremity function following neuromotor impairment Kinematic Analyses of Locomotion We are developing and validating objective, quantitative measures of locomotor function based on kinematic measurements. We hypothesize that some important aspects of locomotion to capture are: 1. Movement frequency 2. Movement shape (at a single-joint level) 3. Movement coordination (among joints) 4. Movement consistency 5. Higher-order coordination (among legs) To perform the joint-level comparison of stepping kinematics, we use an analysis based on the continuous wavelet transform (CWT; Burke-Hubbard, 1998). Mean angle trajectories for each joint are averaged across uninjured animals during bipedal stepping to yield characteristic movement trajectories for each joint. The angle trajectories are individually normalized to zero mean, and then the set of leg angle trajectories is shifted in phase to minimize the total angles at the beginning and end of the resulting set of trajectories (while maintaining phase relationships among the trajectories). Each angle trajectory is then fitted with a 10th-order polynomial. The resulting polynomials for each joint angle trajectory are used as mother wavelets. For each stepping trial, CWTs are calculated for each joint angle at a scale corresponding to the mean stride duration observed during stepping by uninjured animals. Positive CWT coefficients indicate a positive correlation between the angular movements of the joint and the wavelet - an index of the similarity of the stepping kinematics around that time point to those of uninjured animals. The mean-squared value of the positive wavelet coefficients (negative coefficients were set to zero) are calculated over the entire time series for each joint. These mean-squared values are summed across joints of each leg of a given animal to yield a "wavelet resemblance" (WR), considered a measure of the degree to which individual joints exhibited step-like kinematics over the entire trial. Step-like movements of larger amplitude lead to higher WR values than smaller movements. The WR thus does not reflect the coordination among leg joints. Neurophysiological Assessment We are working to improve on noninvasive methods for analyses of spinal cord recovery after injury. Noninvasive electrophysiological methods have been useful for quantitative assessments of spinal connectivity following injury and evaluation of treatment strategies. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) can be elicited by stimulation of the motor cortex or spinal cord, even with acutely-implanted, subcutaneous electrodes. In humans, MEPs have been elicited by magnetic stimulation of the brain, or by electrically stimulating the brainstem using surface electrodes placed over the mastoid processes of the skull (Taylor and Gandevia, 2004). Similar techniques are also effective in animal models such as rats. For motor cortex stimulation in rats, the cathode has typically been implanted beneath the skin on the skull over the motor cortex, and the anode implanted in the nose (Lopez-Vales, et al., 2006). Brief (100 microsecond) relatively powerful (25 milliampere) electric pulses stimulate the brain, and the resulting evoked potential is recorded electromyographically from muscles in the limbs. Although gross measures, such as latency and amplitude of the resulting potentials have been reported for diagnostic purposes, relatively few studies have investigated the specific pathways contributing to MEPs, and the degree to which detailed analysis of the evoked potentials could yield information about spinal connectivity (Gennuso, et al., 1991). Consequently, we have initiated a study into electricaly-induced MEPs through cortical and spinal stimulation to gain a better understanding of how this technique can reveal neural plasticity following SCI. Using reconfigurable technology for quantitative assessment of motor control in humans (in collaboration with Roozbeh Jafari) We are developing a clinical movement assessment system (CMAS), a robust and flexible hardware and software system for quantitative measurements of motor effort following neuromotor injury. The system will allow for easy and versatile data collection by non-technical staff and patients from a variety of devices by using recent advances in technology for real-time reconfiguration. We are currently working to demonstrate the effectiveness of the system by developing two patient-friendly devices. One device measures individual finger forces in flexion and extension, and one device will measure finger movements for extended periods in a home setting. The effectiveness of the CMAS and finger devices will be demonstrated by using the system to make quantitative assessments of neuromotor effort following stroke in a patient population. This project will result in new techniques that use advances in system reconfiguration to create a versatile networked platform capable of supporting many devices to measure neuromotor function. The important considerations of security, power management, and fault tolerance will be fundamental elements of the system design. The system will include hardware and software features designed to accommodate a wide range of patient specific motor capabilities, and provide real-time output of dynamic forces and positions with visual and auditory feedback in an interactive interface. For neuroscience, the CMAS system will allow for unique measurements of finger force generation and coordination capabilities in flexion and extension following neuromotor injury. The CMAS system will also allow some of the first quantitative measurements of hand use for extended periods in the home environment. The development of this system will have broad impact in basic neuroscience, computer science, clinical medicine, and rehabilitation. |