![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
| SYLLABI |
||
| 2009 |
SPRING |
KIN 345: MOTOR CONTROL,
DEVELOPMENT, AND LEARNING |
| 2009 |
FALL |
KIN 494/598: COMPARATIVE
BIOMECHANICS AND MOTOR CONTROL |
|
EDUCATIONAL GOALS AND APPROACH
My
primary objective as an educator is to encourage students to develop
the
background knowledge, research skills, and critical thinking necessary
to
develop and defend reasoned conclusions, specifically scientific
hypotheses --
a fundamental skill for the twenty-first century. My educational
strategy is
motivated by the hypothesis that students can occupy several positions
of
critical thinking (Table 1). The first position, Dualism,
is characterized by assumptions that ideas or facts can be
unequivocally known as true or untrue. Authorities, such as textbooks
or
professors, are considered to have knowledge of true facts that they
can
disseminate to students. Authorities are also considered able to teach
students
to distinguish between correct and incorrect ideas. In the second
position, Multiplicity, the absolute truth or
falsehood of facts is questioned. Instead, different opinions are
considered
equally valid in many areas. Encouraging students to think
independently and
develop individual perspectives is considered to be the purpose of
education.
Finally, Critical understanding does
not consider facts or ideas to be equally valid, but acknowledges that
they are
necessarily situated in evidentiary (and even cultural) contexts. The
contextual reference of facts and the possibility of competing ideas do
not,
however, prevent commitments to specific ideas or courses of action.
Uncertainty can be overcome by critical evaluation of evidence, and
reasoned
conclusions can be reached. |
|
Table 1: Positions of thinking |
|||
|
|
Dualism ----------> |
Multiplicity ----------> |
Critical Understanding |
|
Assumed nature of knowledge |
Absolute: True or false ideas or facts exist. |
Relative: Absolutely true or false ideas or facts do
not exist. All opinions are equally useful. |
Reasoned: Facts and ideas depend on available evidence
and context. However, some facts or ideas can be better supported than
others. |
|
Process of learning |
Communication of facts and techniques from
authorities. |
Independent exploration. Acknowledging
different opinions. |
Gathering evidence and constructing
arguments. |
|
Role of student |
Memorize or understand factual information. |
Think independently. Form opinions. |
Critically evaluate alternative hypotheses
based on evidence. Commit to best supported ideas. |
|
Simplified from: Perry, W.G. (1970). Forms of
intellectual and ethical development in the college years: a scheme.
New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston. Baxter Magolda, M.B. (1992). Knowing
and reasoning in college: gender-related patterns in students'
intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. |
|||
|
My focus on
developing critical
thinking structures my teaching approach around four principal emphases: Emphasis
on conceptual tools. Firm theoretical frameworks help organize data
and
generate hypotheses. Often, even simple mathematical descriptions of
biological
systems can identify important variables and reveal the overall
behavior of
complex systems. I believe that structuring a course of study around
recurring
conceptual themes helps students understand general biological
principles,
while also helping students learn the terminology and descriptive facts
that
are important to biology and other natural sciences. Fundamental
electrical engineering concepts of resistance (conductance), potential
differences, and Ohm's law can describe many physiological processes,
such as
thermoregulation, osmoregulation and gas transport. Similarly, concepts
from
physics, mechanical engineering, fluid dynamics, and controls systems
theory
can serve to link and explain many aspects of morphology, physiology,
and
behavior. Introducing developmental and evolutionary concepts such as
phylogenetic constraints and epistasis can help students place
physiological
knowledge into a broader biological context. Strong conceptual
frameworks help
to provide the context within which students can actively engage
biological
problems and evaluate hypotheses. Emphasis
on process. Scientific facts are
usually discovered
through a series of experimental processes that measure and describe
natural
phenomena. Consequently, research findings are limited, to greater or
lesser
extents, by the theoretical and technological environment of these
processes.
When presenting research findings it is important to consider the
process of
experimental science leading to them. Conducting experiments and
analyzing
real experimental data are important for introducing students to the
strengths and limitations of
experimental science. This experience is invaluable for helping
students to
critically evaluate different types of experimental data. Emphasis
on new technology. New technologies
hold a tremendous potential
to contribute to education and the development of critical thinking.
The broad
amount of information available to students and the public through
media and
the Internet requires people to evaluate data and arrive at reasoned
judgments.
Memorization of facts will become less and less important as more
information
is immediately available to everyone. For
example, virtual discussion groups using electronic mail and
the Internet can allow students direct access to the authors of the
papers in
their course reader. Emphasis
on current research. I seek to integrate current research into
every aspect of
my teaching, as advocated by the Carnegie Foundation's Boyer Commission
report.
Physiology, biomechanics and motor control research are ideal fields
for
training students to think critically and actively engage in research.
These
fields integrate information from many active research areas, including
cell
physiology (neural properties, muscle physiology), anatomy (neural
organization,
musculoskeletal structures), and behavior (mechanical task
requirements,
mechanical and sensory interactions with the environment) to understand
function. To understand physiology and behavior, students must
critically
evaluate mechanical, energetic, and neural hypotheses. Students
integrate tools
learned from undergraduate coursework in chemistry, physics, and
biology, to
gain critical understanding of physiological research problems and
directly
test current biological hypotheses. |